\n\n

Key developments: The Third Circuit affirmed that Westlaw’s editorial headnotes are protectable original works and that ROSS Intelligence’s copying of roughly 2,200 headnotes to train its AI‑powered legal‑research platform …

\n\n

The Third Circuit affirmed that Westlaw’s editorial headnotes qualify for copyright protection and that ROSS Intelligence’s copying of those headnotes to train its competing legal‑research AI platform does not …

\n\n

Key developments:

• A federal appellate court ruled that legal headnotes are protected by copyright and that using them to train a competing AI platform does not qualify as

…