Category: AI in courts

Key developments: A British Columbia Court of Appeal justice warned that AI‑prepared submissions are overwhelming judges, who “cannot provide an unlimited audience” to irrelevant, verbose filings. The ruling highlights systemic risks such as hallucinated cases, irrelevant citations, and…

Key developments: – The U.S. Third Circuit issued the first federal appellate ruling on AI‑training fair‑use, affirming that Ross Intelligence’s use of Westlaw headnotes was not transformative and infringed copyright (Sept 29 2026). – U.S. courts are increasingly sanctioning lawyers…

Recent developments show courts worldwide wrestling with AI’s role. In the United States, the Third Circuit’s September 2026 ruling that Ross Intelligence’s use of Westlaw headnotes was not fair use marks the first federal appellate decision on AI‑training…